Bill C-76 received royal assent earlier this month. Among many of its changes was one modifying the voting rights of non-resident Canadians. Specifically, the bill:

  1. Removed the requirement that non-resident Canadians could only vote if they’d been out of the country for five consecutive years or less
  2. Removed the requirement that non-resident Canadians had to affirm – in a statement – that they intended to return to Canada

I strongly disagree with this change.

Voting is not an inalienable right. You should only be allowed to vote if you are a citizen and your day-to-day life is affected by the government(s) you’re voting for. Non-residents fail the second test. Why should their priorities be considered while designing policies for those who actually live in a jurisdiction and feel the effects of those policies? And, why should we extend the franchise to non-residents? After all, by living outside of Canada for over five years they’ve showed that they aren’t invested in the country – at least for now, at least not when it comes to its present, day-to-day governance.

I feel the previous rules were appropriate: it allowed non-residents to vote for a single, additional federal election cycle. After that, if you wanted to regain your franchise you had the responsibility to demonstrate your commitment to Canada in a tangible, physical way: by returning here, living here, and living through the effect of the policies you voted in place.

Add comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.